Interv Akut Kardiol 2011; 10(Suppl. D): 15-20

Intravascular ultrasound

Tomáš Kovárník1, Jan Horák1, Milan Šonka2
1 II. interní klinika kardiologie a angiologie Všeobecné fakultní nemocnice v Praze a 1. lékařské fakulty UK, Praha
2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City IA, USA

The authors are presenting an overview of current indication for intravascular ultrasound in catheterization laboratory. Practical applications

in daily life are underlined. Summary encompasses the examples of 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries done by fusion of

angiography and intravascular ultrasound

Keywords: intravascular ultrasound, coronary interventions

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kovárník T, Horák J, Šonka M. Intravascular ultrasound. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2011;10(Suppl. D):15-20.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfiels K, Siegel K, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG. American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS) a report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. JACC 2001; 37: 1478-1492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Mintz GS, Garcia-Gracia HM, Nicholls SJ, Weissman NJ, Bruining N, Crowe T, Tardif JC, Serruys PW. Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression. progression studies. Eurointervention 2011; 6: 1123-1130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Wahle A, Prause GPM, DeJong SC, Sonka M. Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography - methods and validation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999; 18: 686-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Wahle A, Lopez J, Olszewski M, Vigmostad S, Chandran K, Rossen J, Sonka M. Plaque development, vessel curvature, and wall shear stress in coronary arteries assessed by X-ray angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Medical Image Analysis 2006; 10: 615-631. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Kotani J, Mintz GS, Rai P, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of angiographic filling defects in native coronary arteries: Do they always contain thrombi? JACC 2004; 44: 2087-2089. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Grewal J, Ganz P, Selwyn A, et al. Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound in preventing stenting of hazy areas adjacent to coronary stents and its support of support spot-stenting. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 1246-1249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Ziada KM, Tuzcu EM, De Franco AC, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the prevalence and cause of angiographic, ,haziness" following high-pressure coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 116-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Mintz GS. Intracoronary ultrasound. Taylor & Francis 2005. Go to original source...
    9. Pijls NH, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. NEJM 1996; 334: 1703-1708. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 136-141. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard A, et al. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 423-428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Nishioka T, Amanullah A, Luo H, et al. Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1870-1878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Suzuki K, et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological asessment of coronary stenosis. Circulation 1999; 100: 250-255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings. Circulation 1999; 100: 256-261. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 2831-2836. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, A. Abizaid, et al. One-year follow-up after intravascular ultrasound assessment of moderate left main coronary artery disease in patients with ambiquous angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 707-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SCh, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee ChW, Park SW, Park SJ. Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 4: 65-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Ben-Dor. Eurointervention 2011 přijato k publikaci.
    19. Park Seun-Jung, EuroPCR 2011.
    20. Suter Y, Schoenenberger AW, Toggweiler S, Jamshidi P, Resink T, Erne P. Intravascular ultrasound-based left main coronary artery assessment: comparison between pullback from left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21: 457-460. Go to PubMed...
    21. Oviedo C, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Tsujita K, Kubo T, Doi H, Castellanos C, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Dangas G, Leon MB, Stone G, Templin B, Araki H, Ochiai M, Moses JW. Is accurate intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the left circumflex ostium from a left anterior descending to left main pullback possible? Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 948-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim WJ, Suh J, Yun SCh, Lee CHW, Hong MK, Lee JH, Park SW; MAIN-COMPARE Investigators. Impact of intravascular guiaxdance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 167-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 43-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW, Leon MB, Mintz GS. Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug-eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 374-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standad stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1315-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russel ME. Apolymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 221-230. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Jako J, et al. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1959-1963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Moses JW, Dangas G, Mehran R, Mintz GS. Drug-eluting stents in real world: how intravascular ultrasound can improve clinical outcome. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102(suppl): 24J-28J. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Jeremias A, Sylvia B, Bridges J, et al. Stent thrombosis after successful sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 2004; 109: 1930-1932. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Cutlip DE, Baim DS, Ho KK, Popma JJ, Lansky AJ, Cohen DJ, Carrozza JP Jr, Chauhan MS, Rodriguez O, Kuntz RE. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation 2001; 103: 1967-1971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Fuji K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent under expansion and residual reference segment stenos are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. JACC 2005; 45: 995-998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Okabe T, Mintz GS, Buch A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound parameters associated with stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent deployment. Am J Cardiol 2007; 4: 615-620. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Uren NG, Schwarzacher P, Metz JA, et al. Predictors and outcomes of stent thrombosis. An intravascular ultrasound registry. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 124-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS, et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis. Results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2003; 108: 43-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Roy R, Steinberg DH, Sushinsky SJ, Okabe T, Slottow TP, Kaneshige K, Xue Z, Satler LF, Kent KM, Suddath WO, Pichard AD, Weissman NJ, Lindsay J, Waksman R. The potencial clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. European Heart J 2008; 29: 1851-1857. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. Degertekin M, Serruys PW, Tanabe K, et al. Long-term follow-up of incomplete stent apposition in patients who received sirolimus-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. An intravascular ultrasound analysis. Circulation 2003; 108: 2747-2750. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Serruys PW, Degertekin M, Tanabe K, et al. Intravascular ultrasound findings in the multicenter, randomized, doubleblind RAVEL (RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting VElocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery Lesions) trial. Circulation. 2002; 106: 798-803. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    38. Shah VM, Mintz GS, Apple S, et al. Background incidence of late malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation 2002; 106: 1753-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Tanabe K, Serruys P, Degertekin M, et al. Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents. Insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial. Circulation 2005; 111: 900-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, et al. Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2426-2436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee ChW, Park DW, Park KM, Lee BK, Kim YH, Song JM, Han KH, Kang DH, Cheong SS, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Late stent malapposition after drugeluting stent implantation an intravascular ultrasound analysis with long-term follow-up. Circulation 2006; 113: 414-419. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. Kimura M, Mintz GS, Carlier S, Takebayashi H, Fujii K, Sano K, Yasuda T, Costa RA, Costa JR, Quen J, et al. Outcome after acute incomplete sirolimus-eluting stent apposition as assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 436-442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Gilard M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty compared with stent. Immediate and 6-month results of the multicenter, randomized balloon equivalent to stent study (BEST). Circulation 2003; 107: 545-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Frey A, Hodgson J, Muller Ch, et al. Ultrasound-guided strategy for provisional stenting with focal balloon combination catheter. Results from the randomized strategy for intracoronary ultrasound-guided PTCA and stenting (SIPS) trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 2497-2502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. Gaster A, Skjoldborg S, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insight from a prospective, randomized study. Heart 2003; 89: 1043-1049. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Mueller Ch, Hodgson J, Schindler Ch, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 143-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    47. Aliabadi D, Tilli FV, Bowers TR, Benzuly KH, Safian RD, Goldstein JA, et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 994-997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Furukawa E, Hibi K, Kosuge M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of side branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation Journal 2005; 69: 325-330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    49. Medina A, Martin P, de Lezo JS, Novoa J, Melian F, Hernandez E, de Lezo JS, Pan M, Burgos L, Amador C, Morera O, Garcia A. Ultrasound study of the prevalence of plaque at the carina in lesions that affect the coronary bifurcation: implications for treatment with provisional stent. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64: 43-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    50. Stankovic G, Darremont O, Ferenc M, Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, Albiero R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions: 2008 consensus document from the fourth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. Eurointervention 2009; 5: 39-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    51. Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee ChW, Park SW, Park SJ. Preintervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique. Am J Cardiol 2011 ahead of prints. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    52. De Lezo JS, Medina A, Martin P, et al. Ultrasound findings during percutaneous treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions. Rev Esp. Cardiol. 2008; 61: 930-935. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    53. Fuji K, Kobayashi Y, Mintz GS, et al. Dominant contribution of negative remodeling to development of significant coronary bifurcation narrowing. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 59-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    54. Nishida T, Colombo A, Briguori C, et al. Outcome of nonobstructive residual dissections detected by intravascular ultrasound following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1257-1262. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    55. Sheris SJ, Canos MP, Weissman NJ, et al. Natural history of intravascular ultrasound-detected edge dissections from coronary stent deployment. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 59-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    56. Kovarnik T, Mintz GS, Sonka M. The late stent malapposition develops also after paclitaxel balloon predilatation before bare-metal stent implantation: case description. Eur Heart J. 2011 Feb. Přijato k publikaci. Go to original source...

    Return to the content


    Interventional Cardiology

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.