Interv Akut Kardiol. 2022;21(4):229-239 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2022.036

Coronary physiology assessment: a routine method in a modern catheterization center

Kristýna Hlaváčová1, Jan Kaňovský1, 2, Ivona Kask1, David Pospíšil1, 2, Martin Hudec1, 2, Petr Kala1, 2
1 Interní kardiologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Brno
2 Interní kardiologická klinika, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno

Hemodynamic examination of coronary lesions using both hyperemic and non-hyperemic indices is currently a routine part of invasive procedures in catheterization laboratories. The most frequent indication for hemodynamic assessment is to clarify the functional significance of angiographically borderline lesions. Fractional flow reserve is used to assess the degree of functional impairment of the epicardial arteries. Coronary flow reserve is used to describe the hemodynamic condition of the coronary vessels and microvasculature. The microcirculation itself is characterized by the index of microvascular resistance. Thanks to the dynamic development of technology and efforts to reduce the costs and the degree of invasiveness of the examination, new modern methods are being developed. They allow to achieve the functional characteristics of borderline lesions on the basis of imaging data only, whether derived from angiography or, for example, CT coronary angiography.

Keywords: fractional flow reserve, microcirculation, pressure wire and microcatheter, angiography.

Accepted: December 9, 2022; Published: December 19, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hlaváčová K, Kaňovský J, Kask I, Pospíšil D, Hudec M, Kala P. Coronary physiology assessment: a routine method in a modern catheterization center. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2022;21(4):229-239. doi: 10.36290/kar.2022.036.
Download citation

References

  1. Mates M, Kala P, Paleček T, et al. Doporučené postupy ESC pro diagnózu a léčbu chronických koronárních syndromů, 2019. Souhrn dokumentu vypracovaný Českou kardiologickou společností. Cor Vasa. 2020;62(2):199-233. doi: 10.33678/cor.2020.028. Go to original source...
  2. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary­‑artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604. PMID: 8637515. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fearon WF, Chambers JW, Seto AH, et al; ACIST­‑FFR Study Investigators. ACIST­‑FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter­‑Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec;10(12):e005905. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005905. PMID: 29246917; PMCID: PMC5753822. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Achenbach S, Rudolph T, Rieber J, et al. Performing and Interpreting Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Document. Interv Cardiol. 2017 Sep;12(2):97-109. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:13:2. PMID: 29588737; PMCID: PMC5808579. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow­‑up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007. 01. 087. Epub 2007 May 17. PMID: 17531660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. PMID: 19144937. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow­‑up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010. 04. 012. Epub 2010 May 28. PMID: 20537493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve­‑guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov;367(18):1768. Mobius­‑Winckler, Sven [corrected to Möbius­‑Winkler, Sven]. PMID: 22924638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Mates M. Frakční průtoková rezerva myokardu. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2011;10(Suppl. D):24-30. doi: 10.nnnn/kar.2011.034.
  10. Jeřábek Š, Kovárník T. Hodnocení hemodynamické významnosti koronárních stenóz metodou frakční průtokové rezervy [Functional assessment of coronary stenosis by fractional flow reserve]. Cas Lek Cesk. 2016;155(4):17-21. Czech. PMID: 27481197. Go to PubMed...
  11. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1354-67. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87. 4. 1354. PMID: 8462157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hein R, Excaned J, Klauss V. Assessment of stenosis severity with intraconorary pressure and thermodilution measurements. Coronary Stenosis Imaging, Structure and Physiology. Europa Edition 2010; Escaned Javier and Serruys Patric W., Eds. Toulouse­‑France: Fréderic Doncieux, 2010: 355-376.
  13. Chalupa D, Chutný P, Kala P, et al. Měření frakční průtokové rezervy. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2015;14(3):129-131.
  14. [Internet]. ACIST Medical Systems Inc. Návod k použití Navvus. 2017. [Cited Feb 14, 2022]. Available from: https://eregpublicsecure.ksrzis.cz/Registr/RZPRO/ZdravotnickyProstredek/Detail/67408##.
  15. [Internet]. Kern M. Comparing FFR Tools: New Wires and a Pressure Microcatheter. Cath Lab Digest. Available from: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/cathlab/article/comparing­‑ffr­‑tools­‑new­‑wires­‑pressure­‑microcatheter.[Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  16. [Internet]. st. Jude Medical. Instruction For Use, PressureWire X, Guidewire. Jun. 2016. Available from: https://eregpublicsecure.ksrzis.cz/Registr/RZPRO/ZdravotnickyProstredek/Detail/140333##. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  17. [Internet]. Volcano Corporation. Návod k použití - Verrata Plus. Apr. 2021. Available from: https://eregpublicsecure.ksrzis.cz/Registr/RZPRO/ZdravotnickyProstredek/Detail/219462. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  18. [Internet]. Boston Scientific. Návod k použití - Comet Tlakový vodící drát. May 2018. Available from. https://eregpublicsecure.ksrzis.cz/Registr/RZPRO/ZdravotnickyProstredek/Detail/107659. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  19. [Internet]. OpSens Inc. Návod k použití - OpSens OptoWire III. Nov. 2020. Available from: https://eregpublicsecure.ksrzis.cz/Registr/RZPRO/ZdravotnickyProstredek/Detail/213238. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  20. Herscovici R, Sedlak T, Wei J, et al. Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): What Is the Risk? J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 4;7(17):e008868. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008868. PMID: 30371178; PMCID: PMC6201435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, et al. Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2841-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018. 09. 006. Epub 2018 Sep 25. PMID: 30266608. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Kobayashi Y, Fearon WF. Invasive coronary microcirculation assessment--current status of index of microcirculatory resistance. Circ J. 2014;78(5):1021-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0364. Epub 2014 Apr 16. PMID: 24739222. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Kovárník T, Jeřábek Š, Kala P. Funkčně vedená revaskularizace myokardu. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2020;19(1):39-46. doi: 10.36290/kar.2020.017. Go to original source...
  24. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation. 2001 Oct 23;104(17):2003-6. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.099223. PMID: 11673336. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation. 2002 May 28;105(21):2482-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000017199.09457.3d. PMID: 12034653. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Ang DTY, Berry C. What an Interventionalist Needs to Know About INOCA. Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 12;16:e32. doi: 10.15420/icr.2021. 16. PMID: 34950239; PMCID: PMC8674629. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. [Internet]. Physiology Indices IMR and CFR. Available from: https://www.cardiovascular.abbott/int/en/hcp/products/percutaneous­‑coronary­‑intervention/physiology­‑indices/imr­‑cfr.html. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  28. Mangiacapra F, Viscusi MM, Verolino G, et al. Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function. J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 31;11(1):228. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010228. PMID: 35011968; PMCID: PMC8745537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003 Jul 1;107(25):3129-32. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1. Epub 2003 Jun 23. Erratum in: Circulation. 2003 Dec 23;108(25):3165. PMID: 12821539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Toya T, Ahmad A, Corban MT, et al. Risk Stratification of Patients With NonObstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using Resistive Reserve Ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020464. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020464. Epub 2021 May 15. PMID: 33998253; PMCID: PMC8483554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Maznyczka AM, Oldroyd KG, Greenwood JP, et al. Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May;13(5):e008505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505. Epub 2020 May 15. PMID: 32408817; PMCID: PMC7237023. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. [Internet]. Munhoz D, Sonck J, Collet C. Pullback Pressure Gradient: Discriminating Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Using Coronary Physiology. Available from: Available: https://citoday.com/articles/2021-may­‑june/pullback­‑pressure­‑gradient­‑discriminating­‑focal­‑and­‑diffuse­‑coronary­‑artery­‑disease­‑using­‑coronary­‑physiology. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  33. Lee SH, Lee JM, Park Jet al; International Collaboration of Comprehensive Physiologic Assessment Investigators. Prognostic Implications of Resistive Reserve Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e015846. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015846. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PMID: 32306809; PMCID: PMC7428535. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Collet C, Sonck J, Vandeloo B, et al. Measurement of Hyperemic Pullback Pressure Gradients to Characterize Patterns of Coronary Atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 8;74(14):1772-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019. 07. 072. PMID: 31582137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. [Internet]. Pullback Pressure Gradient (PPG) Global Registry - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04789317 [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  36. Original pictures, Courtesy of Carlos Collet, MD, PhD, Daniel Munhoz, MD.
  37. Morris PD, Curzen N, Gunn JP. Angiography­‑Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: More or Less Physiology? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e015586. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015586. Epub 2020 Mar 11. PMID: 32157954; PMCID: PMC7335504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton ACet al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012. 08. 024. PMID: 23428006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire­‑Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107. PMID: 29555835; PMCID: PMC5895131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Xing Z, Pei J, Huang J, et al. Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar­‑Apr;34(2):165-172. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0234. PMID: 30916126; PMCID: PMC6436789. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography­‑Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017. 10. 035. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PMID: 29101020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Xu B, Tu S, Song L, et al. FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio­‑guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham­‑controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4. PMID: 34742368. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Masdjedi K, van Zandvoort LJ, Balbi MM, et al. Validation of novel 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography based software to calculate fractional flow reserve post stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):671-677. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29311. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PMID: 33022098; PMCID: PMC8519140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. [Internet]. vFFR: Pie medical imaging. Available from: https://www.piemedicalimaging.com/product/caas­‑workstation/vffr. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  45. [Internet]. Comparison of Vessel­‑FFR Versus FFR in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03497637. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  46. [Internet]. FAST III. Available from: https://www.ecri­‑trials.com/studies/fast­‑iii. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  47. Fearon WF, Achenbach S, Engstrom Tet al; FAST­‑FFR Study Investigators. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography. Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):477-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037350. PMID: 30586699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, et al. Validation Study of Image­‑Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259. PMID: 28916602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Witberg G, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Angiogram­‑Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Pooled Analysis of 5 Prospective Cohort Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):488-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019. 10. 045. Epub 2020 Jan 29. PMID: 32007461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. [Internet]. Cathworks FFRangio - CathWorks. Available from: https://www.cath.works/cathworks­‑ffrangio. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  51. Ha J, Kim JS, Lim J, et al. Assessing Computational Fractional Flow Reserve From Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis in the Left Anterior Descending Artery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;9(8):e003613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003613. Erratum in: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;10 (1):e000022. PMID: 27502209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012. 11. 083. Epub 2013 Apr 3. PMID: 23562923. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  53. Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 22;73(2):161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018. 10. 056. PMID: 30654888. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, et al. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022. 02. 003. Epub 2022 Apr 13. PMID: 35798401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. [Internet]. Transforming the Diagnosis&Management of Coronary Artery Disease. HeartFlow. Available from: https://www.heartflow.com. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  56. Nørgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, Safian RD, et al. Coronary ct angiography­‑derived fractional flow reserve testing in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Recommendations on interpretation and reporting. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2019;1(5). doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019190050. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. De Maria GL, Garcia­‑Garcia HM, Scarsini R, et al. Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487. Epub 2020 Apr 16. Erratum in: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun;13(6):e000071. PMID: 32295416. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Huang J, Emori H, Ding D, et al. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography­‑based versus angiography­‑based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):568-576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ­‑D-19-01034. PMID: 31951207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Yu W, Huang J, Jia D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary optical coherence tomography­‑derived fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):189-197. doi: 10.4244/EIJ­‑D-19-00182. PMID: 31147309; PMCID: PMC8130381. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. [Internet]. OFR (OCT based FFR) - PULSE - Leading the Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Pan­‑vascular Intervention. Available from: http://en.pulse­‑imaging.com/ofr. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].
  61. Ding D, Yu W, Tauzin H, et al. Optical flow ratio for assessing stenting result and physiological significance of residual disease. EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 17;17(12):e989-e998. doi: 10.4244/EIJ­‑D-21-00185. PMID: 34105514. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Yu W, Tanigaki T, Ding D, et al. Accuracy of Intravascular Ultrasound­‑Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Identifying Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009840. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009840. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PMID: 33541105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. ;[Internet]. UFR (IVUS based FFR) - PULSE - Leading the Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Pan­‑vascular Intervention. Available from: http://en.pulse­‑imaging.com/ufr. [Cited Feb 14, 2022].




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.