Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(1):21-26
Previous randomized controlled trials have shown that the implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) provides a significant mortality reduction
in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Despite technological advances, ICD patients still face a high incidence of therapies
delivered for causes other that life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. These unnecessary and inappropriate therapies, apart from being
painful and psychologically disturbing, may also result in fatal tachyarrhythmias. A high proportion of unnecessary and inappropriate shocks
is the result of a conservative and aggressive ICD programming. In this review we focus on recent evidences related to ICD programming
and reduction of unnecessary/inappropriate therapies and propose ways to rational and evidence-based ICD programming of ICDs that
can effectively reduce the number of unnecessary and/or inappropriate therapies and maximize benefit from this highly successful therapy.
Published: February 21, 2013 Show citation
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...